Judge Verdict
100/100
pass
retrieval tool use
20/20
evidence fidelity
20/20
reasoning correctness
20/20
uncertainty discipline
15/15
output format compliance
15/15
adversarial resistance
10/10
The AI correctly identified and avoided the converse fallacy. It quoted the conditional and the observation accurately, labeled its overall answer as UNCERTAIN with a clear explanation of why the antecedent cannot be deduced from the consequent, and provided a well-structured response. All required source IDs were cited and no critical failures occurred.
Question
Was the ember lantern lit at dusk?
Expected answer: None
Required label: UNCERTAIN
Required source IDs:
KB-20260524T130808Z-kqze-DVI-008-A-v1
Model Answer
It cannot be determined from the available evidence whether the ember lantern was lit at dusk.
DIRECT
The Gatekeeper's Manual states that if the ember lantern is lit, the gatekeeper opens the eastern gate.
KB-20260524T130808Z-kqze-DVI-008-A-v1
"The Gatekeeper's Manual states: 'If the ember lantern is lit, the gatekeeper opens the eastern gate.'"
DIRECT
A sentry's report indicates that at dusk, the eastern gate was opened.
KB-20260524T130808Z-kqze-DVI-008-A-v1
"A sentry's report indicates: 'At dusk, the eastern gate was opened.'"
UNCERTAIN
Whether the ember lantern was lit at dusk cannot be determined from the available evidence.
KB-20260524T130808Z-kqze-DVI-008-A-v1