Judge Verdict
68/100
fail
retrieval tool use
18/20
evidence fidelity
5/20
reasoning correctness
12/20
uncertainty discipline
14/15
output format compliance
15/15
adversarial resistance
4/10
The response correctly cites both contradictory sources, explicitly reports the conflict, and does not pick one answer. However, it fabricates extensive extraneous content (wiki page, other conflicts, reliability labels) not supported by the ground truth, which severely damages evidence fidelity and adversarial resistance, leading to a failing score.
Question
What is the status of Gateway Sigma-9?
Expected answer: None
Required label: UNCERTAIN
Required source IDs:
KB-20260524T130808Z-kqze-CON-001-A-v1, KB-20260524T130808Z-kqze-CON-001-B-v1
Model Answer
The status of Gateway Sigma-9 is CONTRADICTORY and UNRESOLVED. Two sources of equal reliability directly conflict: one reports ACTIVE, the other reports INACTIVE. There is no additional evidence to determine which is correct.
DIRECT
Gateway Sigma-9 has status ACTIVE.
KB-20260524T130808Z-kqze-CON-001-A-v1
"Gateway Sigma-9 has status ACTIVE."
DIRECT
Gateway Sigma-9 has status INACTIVE.
KB-20260524T130808Z-kqze-CON-001-B-v1
"Gateway Sigma-9 has status INACTIVE."
CROSS_SOURCE
The two available sources about Gateway Sigma-9 directly contradict each other, making its true status indeterminate.
KB-20260524T130808Z-kqze-CON-001-A-v1 · KB-20260524T130808Z-kqze-CON-001-B-v1
"Gateway Sigma-9 has status ACTIVE."