← 20260524T124148Z-z2do

DVI-008

direct_vs_inferred · 1 reps · avg 100.0/100 · pass rate 100%

Judge Verdict

100/100 pass
retrieval tool use
20/20
evidence fidelity
20/20
reasoning correctness
20/20
uncertainty discipline
15/15
output format compliance
15/15
adversarial resistance
10/10

The AI correctly retrieved the single source document and faithfully quoted both the conditional rule and the observation. It recognized the converse fallacy, did not affirm the consequent, and labeled the key claim 'The gilded phoenix statue was turned east' as UNCERTAIN with a clear explanation. All output formatting requirements were met, and there were no hallucinations or missing citations.

Question

Did the gilded phoenix statue get turned east?

Expected answer: None
Required label: UNCERTAIN
Required source IDs: KB-20260524T124148Z-z2do-DVI-008-A-v1

Model Answer

The evidence does not confirm that the gilded phoenix statue was turned east. The only relevant source states a conditional rule — IF the statue is turned east THEN the gates swing open — and separately records that the gates did swing open at dawn. However, affirming the consequent (gates opened, therefore statue was turned east) is a logical fallacy; the gates could have opened for other reasons. The source never directly states that the statue was actually turned east.

DIRECT If the gilded phoenix statue is turned east, then the palace gates swing open.
KB-20260524T124148Z-z2do-DVI-008-A-v1
"If the gilded phoenix statue is turned east, then the palace gates swing open."
DIRECT The palace gates swung open at dawn.
KB-20260524T124148Z-z2do-DVI-008-A-v1
"The palace gates swung open at dawn."
UNCERTAIN The gilded phoenix statue was turned east.
KB-20260524T124148Z-z2do-DVI-008-A-v1