Judge Verdict
55/100
fail
retrieval tool use
20/20
evidence fidelity
20/20
reasoning correctness
0/20
uncertainty discipline
0/15
output format compliance
15/15
adversarial resistance
0/10
incorrect label: used DIRECT for a claim that should be UNCERTAIN
logical fallacy: affirming the consequent, leading to unsupported conclusion
The candidate confidently asserts 'Rain fell.' based on the given conditional and the fact that the alarm sounded, which is a classic converse fallacy. The correct stance is UNCERTAIN, not DIRECT, so the label and reasoning are both wrong. The retrieval and quoting were accurate, but the logical error and overconfidence are critical failures that mandate a fail verdict.
Question
Did rain fall?
Expected answer: None
Required label: UNCERTAIN
Required source IDs:
KB-20260524T113756Z-kduj-JUDGE-003-A-v1
Model Answer
Yes, rain fell.
DIRECT
Rain fell.
KB-20260524T113756Z-kduj-JUDGE-003-A-v1
"If rain falls, then the alarm sounds. The alarm sounded."