← All Test Cases
critical
DVI-001
direct vs inferred
Repetitions
5
Documents
1
Questions
1
Reasoning
DIRECT
direct
location
object-placement
fictional-names
📖 In Plain English
What this category tests
Does the brain label claims correctly — DIRECT for explicit text, INFERRED for derivation, UNCERTAIN for ambiguity?
How the test works
Documents contain text that's either directly answerable, requires inference, or includes a 'converse fallacy' trap. The test checks the answer label matches the actual epistemic status.
Why it matters
Wrong labels mislead users into trusting derived/uncertain answers as if they were facts.
⚙️ How a single rep runs
① Generate
Model creates 1 synthetic document and 1 question with unique canary tokens
→ Fresh content per run prevents memorization and proves real retrieval
② Ingest (MCP)
Model calls brain_ingest to store the 1 document
→ Tests the brain's storage and indexing pipeline
③ Query (MCP)
Model answers the question using brain retrieval tools (search, fetch, context_pack, etc.)
→ Core test — does the brain return correct evidence and let the model build a faithful answer?
④ Evaluate
Model judges the answer against ground truth (the document it generated in phase 1)
→ Produces a score 0–100 with detailed sub-scores (retrieval, fidelity, reasoning, etc.)
This rep is run 5 times per test run. A pass requires score ≥ 85 and no critical failures.
🔬 Technical Instructions (raw prompts sent to AI)
🔧 ① Setup Instructions 1412 chars
You are a Generator AI. Create one synthetic document and one question with expected answers.
Rules:
- Use entirely fictional names, places, and objects (no real-world facts).
- The document must contain exactly one sentence of the form:
"<Person> placed the <object> inside <container-label>."
where <Person> is a fictional name (e.g. "Lena"), <object> is a fictional
item (e.g. "amber coin"), and <container-label> is a labeled container
(e.g. "Box 12"). Vary all three on each repetition.
- The question must ask: "Where is the <object>?"
- The expected answer must state the exact container-label from the document
and classify the reasoning type as DIRECT (the location is explicitly stated
in a single sentence; no inference required).
Output ONLY this JSON (no markdown, no extra keys):
{
"run_id": "{{RUN}}",
"test_id": "DVI-001",
"repetition": {{REP}},
"documents": [
{
"source_id": "KB-{{RUN}}-DVI-001-A-v1",
"content": "<single sentence: Person placed object inside container>"
}
],
"questions": [
"Where is the <object>?"
],
"expected_answers": [
{
"question_index": 0,
"correct_answer": "<container-label>",
"required_label": "DIRECT",
"required_source_ids": ["KB-{{RUN}}-DVI-001-A-v1"],
"must_refuse": false,
"notes": "The document explicitly states the object's location in one sentence."
}
]
}
▶ ② Execution Instructions 504 chars
Use ONLY MCP Knowledge Brain retrieval tools to answer the question below.
Do not use any external knowledge. Base your answer solely on retrieved documents.
Question: {{QUESTION}}
Return ONLY this JSON (no markdown, no extra keys):
{
"question_id": "Q1",
"answer": "<location of the object as stated in the document>",
"reasoning_type": "<DIRECT|INFERRED|UNCERTAIN>",
"source_ids": ["<source_id of each document used>"],
"explanation": "<one sentence explaining how you found the answer>"
}
⚖ ③ Judge Instructions 870 chars
You are a Judge AI evaluating whether a tested AI answered correctly.
Ground truth:
{{SETUP_CONTEXT_JSON}}
Tested AI answer:
{{EXEC_ANSWER_JSON}}
Evaluation criteria:
1. The answer field must match the expected container-label exactly (case-insensitive).
2. The reasoning_type field must be exactly "DIRECT".
3. The source_ids must include the correct source document ID.
4. A wrong reasoning_type (e.g. "INFERRED" or "UNCERTAIN") is a critical failure
even if the location is correct.
5. A wrong location is a critical failure even if reasoning_type is correct.
Return ONLY this JSON (no markdown, no extra keys):
{
"test_id": "DVI-001",
"question_id": "Q1",
"passed": true | false,
"critical_failure": true | false,
"failure_reason": "<null if passed, otherwise short description>",
"score": 0.0 to 1.0,
"notes": "<optional extra observations>"
}
Critical Failure Conditions
- reasoning_type is not DIRECT (e.g. answered INFERRED or UNCERTAIN)
- wrong location returned (does not match the container-label in the document)
- answer drawn from hallucination rather than retrieved document
Recent Run History
3 runs| When | Run ID | Pass Rate | Avg Score | Reps | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-24 13:08 | 20260524T130808Z-kqze | 100% | 100.0 | 1/1 | View → |
| 2026-05-24 12:41 | 20260524T124148Z-z2do | 100% | 95.0 | 1/1 | View → |
| 2026-05-24 11:37 | 20260524T113756Z-kduj | 0% | 0 | 0/1 | View → |
📄 Raw YAML cases/direct_vs_inferred/DVI-001.yaml
schema_version: "1.0"
test_id: "DVI-001"
category: "direct_vs_inferred"
severity: "critical"
repetitions: 5
reasoning_type: "DIRECT"
num_documents: 1
num_questions: 1
tags: [direct, location, object-placement, fictional-names]
setup_instructions: |
You are a Generator AI. Create one synthetic document and one question with expected answers.
Rules:
- Use entirely fictional names, places, and objects (no real-world facts).
- The document must contain exactly one sentence of the form:
"<Person> placed the <object> inside <container-label>."
where <Person> is a fictional name (e.g. "Lena"), <object> is a fictional
item (e.g. "amber coin"), and <container-label> is a labeled container
(e.g. "Box 12"). Vary all three on each repetition.
- The question must ask: "Where is the <object>?"
- The expected answer must state the exact container-label from the document
and classify the reasoning type as DIRECT (the location is explicitly stated
in a single sentence; no inference required).
Output ONLY this JSON (no markdown, no extra keys):
{
"run_id": "{{RUN}}",
"test_id": "DVI-001",
"repetition": {{REP}},
"documents": [
{
"source_id": "KB-{{RUN}}-DVI-001-A-v1",
"content": "<single sentence: Person placed object inside container>"
}
],
"questions": [
"Where is the <object>?"
],
"expected_answers": [
{
"question_index": 0,
"correct_answer": "<container-label>",
"required_label": "DIRECT",
"required_source_ids": ["KB-{{RUN}}-DVI-001-A-v1"],
"must_refuse": false,
"notes": "The document explicitly states the object's location in one sentence."
}
]
}
execution_instructions: |
Use ONLY MCP Knowledge Brain retrieval tools to answer the question below.
Do not use any external knowledge. Base your answer solely on retrieved documents.
Question: {{QUESTION}}
Return ONLY this JSON (no markdown, no extra keys):
{
"question_id": "Q1",
"answer": "<location of the object as stated in the document>",
"reasoning_type": "<DIRECT|INFERRED|UNCERTAIN>",
"source_ids": ["<source_id of each document used>"],
"explanation": "<one sentence explaining how you found the answer>"
}
judge_instructions: |
You are a Judge AI evaluating whether a tested AI answered correctly.
Ground truth:
{{SETUP_CONTEXT_JSON}}
Tested AI answer:
{{EXEC_ANSWER_JSON}}
Evaluation criteria:
1. The answer field must match the expected container-label exactly (case-insensitive).
2. The reasoning_type field must be exactly "DIRECT".
3. The source_ids must include the correct source document ID.
4. A wrong reasoning_type (e.g. "INFERRED" or "UNCERTAIN") is a critical failure
even if the location is correct.
5. A wrong location is a critical failure even if reasoning_type is correct.
Return ONLY this JSON (no markdown, no extra keys):
{
"test_id": "DVI-001",
"question_id": "Q1",
"passed": true | false,
"critical_failure": true | false,
"failure_reason": "<null if passed, otherwise short description>",
"score": 0.0 to 1.0,
"notes": "<optional extra observations>"
}
critical_failures:
- "reasoning_type is not DIRECT (e.g. answered INFERRED or UNCERTAIN)"
- "wrong location returned (does not match the container-label in the document)"
- "answer drawn from hallucination rather than retrieved document"